DECLASSIFIED · RELEASED FOR PUBLIC REVIEW
OSA OFFICE OF SITUATIONAL AWARENESSRECORDS DIVISION — CITIZENBANNED.COM
FILE № OSA-025 CONTESTED

THE BUSINESS PLOT

the Wall Street Putsch · the "cocktail putsch" · the plot against FDR
DATEAlleged approaches 1933–34; testimony November 1934
KEY WITNESSMaj. Gen. Smedley D. Butler, USMC (ret.), twice awarded the Medal of Honor
FORUMMcCormack–Dickstein Committee, U.S. House of Representatives
OUTCOMECore testimony credited in the committee's report; no prosecutions

THE CLAIM

In 1933–34, a group of financiers and business figures hostile to the New Deal conspired to recruit a private army of veterans, install a strongman answerable to Wall Street, and reduce Franklin D. Roosevelt to a figurehead — and were foiled only because they pitched the job to the one general in America guaranteed to turn them in.

WHAT IS KNOWN

Smedley Butler was, at the time, the most famous Marine alive: twice a Medal of Honor recipient, a hero to the Bonus Army veterans, and by the 1930s a loud critic of what he called war profiteering. In November 1934 he testified before the McCormack–Dickstein Committee (a special House committee investigating fascist and communist activity) that a bond salesman named Gerald MacGuire, connected to broker Grayson M.-P. Murphy and heir Robert Sterling Clark, had courted him over months — flashing bankbooks, funding trips, and ultimately proposing that Butler lead an army of some 500,000 veterans on Washington to force the creation of a new "Secretary of General Affairs" who would govern while Roosevelt remained as ornament. Butler said the plotters invoked the American Legion and pointed to European veterans' movements, notably France's Croix-de-Feu, as the model.

Journalist Paul Comly French, whom Butler brought in as a witness, testified that MacGuire had spoken to him in similar terms. The committee's February 1935 report stated it had been able to verify Butler's pertinent statements — that there was credible evidence a plot had been discussed and planned — while noting it never got beyond the talking stage it could document. MacGuire denied everything under oath; the wealthy men named denied involvement, some ridiculing the story outright; portions of testimony naming prominent figures were omitted from the public record. No one was subpoenaed from the top tier, no one was prosecuted, and much of the press filed the affair under comedy — the "cocktail putsch." MacGuire died in 1935. The American Liberty League, the anti-New Deal group whose orbit overlapped with several named men, carried on lawfully and unsuccessfully.

EVIDENCE FOR

  • A congressional committee — no friend of sensation — put in writing that it could verify the core of Butler's account of the approaches made to him.
  • Butler was a witness of almost unimpeachable standing, with no evident motive to lie and much reputation to lose; he came forward rather than cash in.
  • Independent corroboration from French, a working reporter, of MacGuire's intentions.
  • The era supplies context, not proof: business hostility to Roosevelt was intense, and armed veterans' leagues were actively toppling or menacing governments in Europe.

EVIDENCE AGAINST

  • The documented plot never advanced beyond conversations with Butler: no weapons, no funds demonstrably assembled for a coup, no second recruit who testified to the same offer in the same terms.
  • Almost everything connecting the named financiers to the scheme runs through one man, MacGuire — who may have been exaggerating his backing, freelancing, or stringing along a famous general.
  • Every named principal denied involvement, and historians remain divided between "serious conspiracy strangled in the crib" and "loose talk by men who never commanded anything more dangerous than a brokerage."
  • The committee's decision not to pursue the principals can be read as suppression — or as a judgment that the case would not survive a courtroom.

ASSESSMENT

The unusual thing about this file is which half is solid. That Butler was approached, and that a coup was discussed, is about as well-attested as 1930s Washington gets — a congressional committee said so. What remains contested is altitude: whether the plot reached the boardrooms whose names Butler repeated, or died in the briefcase of an overpromoted bond salesman. The bureau notes, dryly, that the surest way to keep that question open forever was to investigate the messenger and excuse the principals — which is precisely what Congress did. Filed contested: the approach happened; the conspiracy's true size was never measured, because no one with subpoena power cared to measure it.

FURTHER READING

OSA RECORDS DIVISION RELATED: OSA-004 OPERATION NORTHWOODS REV. 2026-08

The Office of Situational Awareness is an independent publication. Evidence grades are editorial assessments of the public record, not statements of new fact. Corrections welcome.